RAYDAR / CASE STUDYPublic portfolio case study
FROM MARKET SIGNALS TO PRODUCT DECISIONS

From market noise to
product decisions.

Raydar is an AI-assisted commerce intelligence system designed to turn fragmented trend, market, and product evidence into structured, explainable decisions.

CORE PRINCIPLECode calculates.
AI interprets.
Humans decide.
01 / THE PROBLEM

More information was not the answer.

Running a digital product business creates a constant stream of trend signals, competitor observations, seasonal timing, product ideas, and performance data. The real bottleneck was turning those scattered inputs into a consistent decision about what deserved production time.

02 / THE PRODUCT

A decision system, not a trend dashboard.

Raydar structures evidence, scores opportunities with deterministic logic, surfaces the reasoning behind the score, and then moves owner-approved opportunities through a product workflow from research to launch and performance review.

03 / WORKFLOW

One continuous decision loop.

01SIGNALS
02EVIDENCE
03SCORING
04INTERPRETATION
05HUMAN DECISION
06PIPELINE
07LAUNCH
08LEARNING
04 / ARCHITECTURE

Deterministic where it should be.

Numerical scoring is handled by code rather than an LLM. That keeps recommendations reproducible, inspectable, and easier to debug. AI belongs at the interpretation layer: summarizing evidence, identifying patterns, and helping a person understand why an opportunity may matter.

05 / HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP

The model does not get the final vote.

Raydar intentionally separates assistance from authority. The system can organize, compare, score, and recommend. A human owner still decides whether an opportunity moves forward, changes direction, or gets rejected.

06 / SCORING MODEL

Explainable opportunity scoring

Dimensions are scored 0–100 before weighting.

Demand20%

Evidence that buyers are actively looking for or responding to the idea.

Trend Momentum15%

Whether the signal is strengthening across the observed period.

Repeatability15%

Potential to extend the concept into a repeatable product family.

Customization15%

How naturally the opportunity supports personalization or variants.

Product Fit15%

Alignment with the business, production model, and product catalog.

Competition Gap10%

Room to differentiate rather than simply follow a crowded market.

Confidence10%

Strength and consistency of the evidence behind the recommendation.

Saturation Risk−10%

A penalty when strong demand is paired with excessive competition.

07 / ENGINEERING

Built as a portfolio-safe public system.

The public demo is implemented with Next.js, TypeScript, React, Recharts, and Vercel. It uses synthetic and anonymized data, does not expose paid AI endpoints or credentials, and does not persist visitor actions.

08 / PRODUCT JUDGMENT

Private operations, public proof.

The production concept was developed for a real commerce workflow, but the public version was deliberately separated from private competitor intelligence, real sales records, and owner data. The goal is to demonstrate the system without compromising the business behind it.

09 / WHAT I LEARNED

The hardest part of AI product design is deciding where AI should stop.

Raydar reinforced a principle I want to keep applying: useful automation is not measured by how much human judgment it removes. The better system is often the one that improves the quality, speed, and consistency of the decision while keeping accountability with the person making it.

Explore Raydar →Back to portfolio →

Portfolio case study. Demonstration data is synthetic/anonymized and does not represent live business performance.